Park's Vector Transform and Extended Park's Vector Transform

-

The fifteen statistical time features were obtained using the Extended parks vector transform (EPVA) approach. This approach uses the three-phase current signatures and converts it to direct and quadrature components. The transformation from three phase currents to two phase orthogonal components is computed using the equation given below:

After obtaining the direct and quadrature components using the equations given above. The modulus was calculated using the d and q components. The Extended Park Vector Transformation (EPVA) method is used to identify broken rotor defects within the dataset of various classes in a more accurate manner. 






Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What are Broken Rotor bar Faults?!

-
Image
Induction machines are one of the crucial elements of many industrial processes nowadays (IM). These machines are prone to rotor, stator, or bearing failure due to diverse operating circumstances. All of these IM flaws have the potential to impair output, harm neighboring equipment, or, in the worst case, lead to the system’s complete failure[1]–[3]. Induction machines have been in use since the early 1800s. The operators or the equipment close to the working zones may be at danger from this motor’s strong starting torque and high operating speeds. Broken rotor bar defects are one of the frequent causes of motor failure, which may also be brought on by an unfavorable operating environment or artificial mis-operation during the manufacturing process. The rotor bar will first fracture locally, and the surrounding area will experience increased stress. As the defect worsens, the rotor bar entirely breaks, along with any adjacent bars, and finally the whole motor collapses. The early detec
Read more

The Final Results!!!

-
Image
After training, validating and testing the models available in the Classification Learner app, the LSTM model, and the NPR tool model, it was seen that the Cubic Support Vector Machine provided the best test accuracy of 99.8% for 100% load.   The table below shows the accuracies obtained for each of the models for 12.5% of the load. Model Test Accuracy Train Accuracy ROC (AUC) LSTM     93.04%        92.69%        -    SDNN     96.9%        96.6%        -    Quadratic SVM     96.7%        98.5%        Class 1 – 0.9995        Class 2 – 0.9999        Class 3 – 0.9993        Class 4 – 0.9994        Class 5 – 0.9994    Cubic SVM     96.6%        98.7%        Class 1 – 0.9993        Class 2 – 0.9998        Class 3 – 0.9986        Class 4 – 0.9992        Class 5 – 0.9995   
Read more